AT A GLANCE
170
total lots in this scheme
Managed by Strata Choice Pty Ltd. Located in DARLINGHURST, NSW.
Lots
170
Year built
2001
Last report
—
Boundary sourced from NSW Spatial Services (StrataHub).
BUILDING BASICS
3 published court/tribunal decisions involving this strata plan
Cases from NCAT, Supreme Court, Land & Environment Court, and other NSW courts and tribunals.
Owners Strata Plan No.64622 v Australand Constructions Pty Limited
PROCEDURE - costs - departing from the general rule - order for costs on indemnity basis –defendants made an offer to the plaintiff under r 20.26 of the UCPR, to which r 42.15(2)(b)(i) applied, which the plaintiff rejected – whether the Court should exercise its discretion not to award the defendants indemnity costs as contemplated by r 42.15(2) – plaintiff argued that such discretion should be exercised because the plaintiff’s non-acceptance of the offer was “not plainly unreasonable” – held that this was not sufficient to displace the presumption that indemnity costs should be awarded under r 42.15 of the UCPR as exceptional circumstances are required to do this, and no such circumstances arose in this case
[2009] NSWSC 948
The Owners Strata Plan No. 64622 v Australand Constructions Pty Limited
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Claim for damages by Owners’ Corporation against builders for defective construction - reference to referee of both liability and quantum – referee reports on liability and quantum – parties agree that reports on liability should be adopted – parties also agreed on quantum of damages in respect of some defects – application by plaintiff that report on quantum should be rejected and application by defendants that report on quantum should be adopted – where referee rejected entirety of plaintiff’s expert evidence on quantum and plaintiff accepts that even if admitted that evidence would not enable assessment of damages – application to lead quantum evidence of a different nature or admissible evidence of the same type rejected by the referee and for further hearing on damages in respect of defects where damages not agreed – relevant considerations – plaintiff’s application refused – referee’s report on quantum adopted – judgment for plaintiff in amount of damages agreed by parties.
[2009] NSWSC 1083
Motor Group Australia Pty Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 64622
[CONTRACT] - Whether the parties agreed that the plaintiff's use of the common property in a high rise apartment block was to be without fee - Whether the signing of and support for the plaintiff's development application constituted a contract between the parties that no fee would be charged for the use of common property. - [MISLEADING & DECEPTIVE CONDUCT] - Whether a letter from the Executive Committee of the defendant contained a representation that no fee would be charged to the plaintiff for the use of the common property - Whether the plaintiff relied upon the alleged representation when it entered into a lease over Retail Space, undertook renovations and opened a retail showroom - Whether the defendant's silence in relation to fees for the use of common property constituted a representation that there would be no fees. - [UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT / EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL] - Whether the defendant, in seeking to impose a fee upon the plaintiff for the use of common property, engaged in unconscionable conduct within the meaning of section 51AA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) - Whether there was consent to the use of common property and the extent of any consent - Whether there was an expectation in the plaintiff that it would be able to use common property without fee - Whether the defendant is estopped from denying agreement to use the common property without fee. - [TORT - TRESPASS] - Whether the plaintiff's signage on the common property and use of the concrete walls on common property amount to trespass - Whether loss of a commercial fee for use of the common property was the natural and probable consequence of the trespass - Whether injunction should be granted.
[2004] NSWSC 633
Source: NSW Caselaw. Only published decisions are shown. Many disputes are resolved privately or through mediation and will not appear here. This is not a complete record of all disputes involving this strata plan. Categories are auto-classified and may not be 100% accurate.
| Date | Unit | Price |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Aug 2025 | Lot 4 | $1,675,000 |
| 3 May 2025 | Lot 55 | $1,555,000 |
| 9 Oct 2024 | Lot 20 | $2,675,000 |
| 5 Aug 2024 | Lot 21 | $975,000 |
| 23 July 2024 | Lot 61 | $1,475,000 |
| 21 June 2024 | Lot 55 | $1,475,000 |
| 21 June 2024 | Lot 107 | $2,100,000 |
| 21 May 2024 | Lot 17 | $1,245,000 |
| 19 Apr 2024 | Lot 124 | $4,375,000 |
| 22 Nov 2023 | Lot 121 | $1,440,000 |
187 sales total
Source: NSW Valuer General. Prices are as reported in settlement data and may not reflect current market values. Sales marked “Price withheld” are excluded from price calculations.
Original Construction · 2 storeys · 1 dwelling
Estimated cost: $3.0M · Assessed by Council of the City of Sydney
Development Application
DeterminedAlterations and additions to residential development
PAN-327902
Development Application
DeterminedNearbyResidential flat building, Alterations or additions to an existing building or structure
PAN-388901
Development Application
CancelledNearbyAlterations and additions to residential development
PAN-327405
Search for the application number (e.g., PAN-327902) on the NSW Planning Portal Application Tracker to view the full DA details, including the applicant, builder, and principal certifier.
Source: NSW Planning Portal Open Data API (2019+). Earlier development applications may not be available. Items marked "Nearby" were matched by location proximity (within 100m) rather than direct plan number reference.
These statistics cover the entire Sydney local government area, not this specific property.
Crime rates in Sydney LGA are significantly higher than the NSW state average. (Oct 2024 - Sep 2025)
Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR). Rates are per 100,000 population. Rank is out of 119 LGAs (1 = highest rate).