AT A GLANCE
18
total lots in this scheme
Managed by The Strata Collective Pty Ltd. Located in SYDNEY, NSW.
Lots
18
Year built
2002
Last report
—
Boundary sourced from NSW Spatial Services (StrataHub).
STRATA MANAGER
The Strata Collective Pty Ltd
View profile →
BUILDING BASICS
3 published court/tribunal decisions involving this strata plan
Cases from NCAT, Supreme Court, Land & Environment Court, and other NSW courts and tribunals.
Diaspora Holdings Pty Limited & Anor v The Owners Strata Plan No. 68608
STRATA PLANS - Operation of Car Park contrary to development application - Whether the tort of unlawful interference with trade forms part of the common law of Australia
[2024] NSWDC 46
Preston v Diaspora Holdings Pty Ltd; Diaspora Holdings Pty Ltd v Owners Corporation of Strata Plan 68608
CIVIL PROCEDURE — Cross-vesting — Transfer to Federal Court — Special federal matter – whether Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth), s 6 required proceedings to be transferred to the Federal Court as a “special federal matter” – whether proceedings “in bankruptcy” under Bankruptcy Act, s 27 – distinction between exercising jurisdiction “in bankruptcy” and recognising the effect of provisions of the Bankruptcy Act – whether proceedings a “special federal matter” where trustee in bankruptcy was joined as a party although made no claim, no party sought exercise of statutory powers under the Bankruptcy Act or an order declaring for or against the title of the trustee in bankruptcy to the relevant share in the company. CIVIL PROCEDURE — Cross-vesting — Transfer to Federal Court — Special federal matter – whether retention of proceedings would have been justified under Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth), s 6(3), had proceedings constituted a “special federal matter”– relevance and weight of “convenience of the parties” under s 6(3) – where two sets of proceedings raised parallel issues and proceedings could only be heard together in Supreme Court as Federal Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal from the Tribunal – where retention of the proceedings would likely result in a more efficient determination of the dispute – whether retention would have been justified where it would not just be convenient to the parties but would promote the better administration of justice. CORPORATIONS — Directors and officers — Appointment, removal and retirement of directors — whether sole shareholder of proprietary company validly appointed himself director by shareholders resolution - where share transferred to sole shareholder in his capacity as trustee prior to his impending bankruptcy – whether upon sole shareholder’s bankruptcy the power to appoint a director which attached to the share vested in his trustee in bankruptcy under Bankruptcy Act, ss 58(1), 116(2)(a) – nature of equitable interest in the share retained by the sole shareholder during bankruptcy and nature of equitable interest acquired by his trustee in bankruptcy pursuant to Corporations Act, ss 1072B, 1072C, 1072F – whether sole shareholder’s bankruptcy restricted exercise of power of appointment under Corporations Act, s 201G – whether Corporations Act, s 201F(3) awards trustee in bankruptcy exclusive power to appoint a director during shareholder’s bankruptcy and subsequent to his discharge - grant of statutory power under s 201F(3) facultative not exclusive and must be construed in light of company members’ freedom to adopt principles in company constitution for the appointment of directors. CORPORATIONS — Directors and officers — Appointment, removal and retirement of directors – whether, if invalid, appointment of sole director of proprietary company should have been validated under Corporations Act, s 1322(4) – whether dispensing power would have been available if 201F(3) had exclusive effect – operation of requirements under s 1322(6) – consideration of “essentially of a procedural nature” where no lawful procedure for carrying out statutory requirement – whether “just and equitable” to validate appointment where trustee in bankruptcy took no action to appoint director and no person other than purported sole director asserted interest in the company – whether substantial injustice caused to party opposing claims brought by company in Tribunal proceedings - whether validation of appointment would cause company or beneficiaries “substantial injustice”. CORPORATIONS — Directors and officers — representation – validity of solicitor’s retainer where retained by director whose appointment was purportedly invalid – whether retainer valid under Corporations Act, s 201M – examination of 201M and its historical predecessors alongside construction of s 1322 – whether retainer may be ratified by shareholders resolution – whether company was “competent principal” when without a director – whether majority of general meeting can ratify legal proceedings brought without authority of the company – whether general meeting carries power to make management decisions. CORPORATIONS — Directors and officers — representation – whether solicitor’s retainer should be validated under s 1322(4) – whether “just and equitable” to make order and whether opposing party in proceedings suffered “substantial injustice” by solicitors acting for the company. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - administrative tribunals - statutory appeals from administrative authorities to courts – appeal from decision of Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NSW) under Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 83(1) – whether Tribunal ought have adjourned proceedings to allow NSW Supreme Court to resolve challenge to retainer and validity of director’s appointment - scope and limits of Tribunal’s powers – whether Tribunal had power to make orders sought by virtue of jurisdiction to make “ancillary decisions” or dismiss proceedings that are “frivolous or vexatious or otherwise misconceived”. CIVIL PROCEDURE — Stay of proceedings — Inherent power — Abuse of process – Court may intervene and stay proceedings on basis of an abuse of process where challenge to corporate plaintiff’s authority to bring proceedings – whether and when defendant has right to challenge plaintiff’s authority – – challenge to authority not a substantive defence to plaintiff’s claim but brought by notice of motion –consequences of distinction for further conduct of proceedings - judicial discretion to entertain application and appropriate circumstances to do so - Chancery rule of practice that Court ordinarily adjourn proceedings to allow opportunity for company to ratify proceedings or apply for validating order under Corporations Act, s 1322. CIVIL PROCEDURE — Stay of proceedings — Inherent power — Abuse of process – power to award costs where proceedings brought by corporate plaintiff without authority – juridical basis and appropriate exercise of such power – whether costs order properly made against solicitor for corporate plaintiff bringing proceedings without proper authority.
[2019] NSWSC 651
Diaspora Holdings Pty Ltd v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 68608
STRATA – one share proprietary company as applicant in two proceedings – prior bankruptcy of the shareholder and director – competency to bring the proceedings if power vacuum at Board level – whether the solicitors acting in the proceedings have a valid retainer – whether ratification can cure defects in authority COSTS – exercise of discretion – special circumstances – indemnity costs – costs awarded against a non-party
[2018] NSWCATCD 52
Source: NSW Caselaw. Only published decisions are shown. Many disputes are resolved privately or through mediation and will not appear here. This is not a complete record of all disputes involving this strata plan. Categories are auto-classified and may not be 100% accurate.
| Date | Unit | Price |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2024 | Lot 1 | $7,550,000 |
| 31 May 2024 | Lot 10 | $7,200,000 |
| 21 Apr 2023 | Lot 4 | $7,300,000 |
| 9 Feb 2023 | Lot 7 | $7,600,000 |
| 8 Apr 2019 | Lot 5 | $7,700,000 |
| 17 May 2018 | Lot 14 | $7,095,000 |
| 23 Mar 2017 | Lot 11 | $5,450,000 |
| 26 May 2016 | Lot 2 | $4,250,000 |
| 14 Jan 2016 | Lot 6 | $4,510,000 |
| 28 Aug 2015 | Lot 7 | $4,000,000 |
27 sales total
Source: NSW Valuer General. Prices are as reported in settlement data and may not reflect current market values. Sales marked “Price withheld” are excluded from price calculations.
Original Construction · 1 dwelling
Estimated cost: $149K · Assessed by Council of the City of Sydney
Development Application
DeterminedNearbyAlterations and additions to commercial development, Retail premises
PAN-348850
Modification Application
WithdrawnNearbyPAN-20009
Search for the application number (e.g., PAN-348850) on the NSW Planning Portal Application Tracker to view the full DA details, including the applicant, builder, and principal certifier.
Source: NSW Planning Portal Open Data API (2019+). Earlier development applications may not be available. Items marked "Nearby" were matched by location proximity (within 100m) rather than direct plan number reference.
These statistics cover the entire Sydney local government area, not this specific property.
Crime rates in Sydney LGA are significantly higher than the NSW state average. (Oct 2024 - Sep 2025)
Source: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR). Rates are per 100,000 population. Rank is out of 119 LGAs (1 = highest rate).